As you can pretty much guess its a cliche film about aliens.
(more…)Category: Action
-
Brave (2012)
Another classic Disney movie about saving the world—but this time, what’s the price?
(more…) -
Pandorum (2009)
Pandorum offers a gripping dive into the unknown, blending psychological horror with sci-fi thrills in a way that keeps you on the edge of your seat. However…there are some aspects of the film’s premise and backstory that leave you scratching your head, making it hard to fully immerse in the world it tries to create.
The central concept of the ship being underwater raises immediate questions, particularly around the idea of how the crew could survive in such a hostile environment. The movie never really provides any real explanation as to how they could breathe underwater, which leaves you to wonder if this was simply an oversight or a missed opportunity to explore the technology or biological modifications that could have allowed for this. The existence of the aliens remains similarly mysterious, and their motivations or origin are left unclear. Did they board the ship while it was sinking? Or were they already there, part of the ship’s mysterious past? The lack of clarity around the aliens makes it difficult to fully grasp their role in the story.
Another element that could have benefited from deeper exploration is the backstory. Earth’s disappearance is never fully explained—why did it vanish? Was it the result of an apocalyptic event, or something more profound? The fact that the aliens were aboard the ship for nearly 934 years adds even more mystery to the timeline. Was this intended to leave viewers in suspense, or was it simply an unresolved narrative thread? And speaking of unresolved, the Pandorum disease itself is introduced as a central plot point but is never fully explained. Why did it affect only one person? Was it an isolated incident, or does it suggest a greater, systemic issue within the ship’s crew?
The logistics of the ship’s operation also raise eyebrows. How were only three people awake and functioning on a massive vessel estimated to weigh over 800,000 tons? The setup seems illogical at times, yet the film pushes forward without addressing these glaring issues, allowing the tension to drive the story instead. While this may work to an extent, it does leave viewers questioning the mechanics of the plot.
The VFX and CGI are rather impressive, especially considering its “modest budget”. It’s a shame this film didn’t make its way to theaters—its eerie atmosphere and tension-filled set design would have translated well on the big screen. The performances, especially from Dennis Quaid and Ben Foster, are strong, with the former delivering a deeply compelling portrayal of a man struggling with the effects of Pandorum and the psychological toll of being trapped in space.
While the character setup is solid, there are moments where the film loses clarity. The Earth reconstruction project, for instance, feels like a huge plot point that’s merely mentioned without much follow-through. Similarly, the female biologist’s sudden combat prowess is a bit jarring. Her transformation from a scientist into a fighter seems almost out of nowhere, with little explanation or buildup to justify her new role. It’s a small issue, but one that disrupts the flow of the story.
For fans of sci-fi horror, Pandorum can certainly delivers. If you enjoy movies set in dark, creaky spaceships where terrifying creatures emerge from the shadows, and the sense of dread never quite lifts, this one’s for you. There’s not much in the way of emotional development until the very end, when the main character reflects on the loss of his wife, a casualty of the Earth’s destruction. But even with its plot holes and unanswered questions, Pandorum remains a solid watch. Its atmosphere, tension, and unique setting make it stand out in the sci-fi horror genre. So, whether you’re a fan of alien encounters, psychological drama, or just enjoy a good, suspense-filled thriller, Pandorum is worth checking out.
-
Super (2010)
A movie about a man who loses everything and decides to become a superhero—not to save the world, but to cling to some psychologically twisted, desperate hope that what happened to him wasn’t real. That maybe, just maybe, if he fights hard enough, he can take it all back.
Driven by a mess of emotions—religious beliefs, depression, rage, boredom, and just the slightest hint of psychopathy—Super isn’t your typical hero origin story. It’s dark, unsettling, and at times, painfully real. I’d even say it outdoes Kick-Ass in terms of realism. While Kick-Ass was all about proving that an ordinary person could make a difference, Super takes a different route. It doesn’t try to be inspiring—it just shows a man spiraling, grasping at purpose through violence, no matter how misguided.
It’s brutally graphic, but that’s part of the point. There’s no sugarcoating anything here—people bleed, people die, and people dream of being more than they are. Whether or not that dream is worth chasing is another story entirely. If you’re into films that explore the thin line between heroism and delusion, this one’s worth watching.
-
Edge Of Tomorrow (2014)
The end is coming. Can humanity stop it? And more importantly—how many times have we already tried?
(more…) -
How To Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)
This 3D animated gem is definitely better than the first—and I’m here for it. The animation, as always, is stunning. The mix of past and present elements is spot on, and while I’m not totally sure what to call the relationships (maybe “young love” or just a little romance?), it was sweet. I was grinning through the whole movie, especially when I got to admire the gorgeous digital artwork. Even when the movie took a sad turn (which was needed and done really well), I couldn’t help but be amazed by the animation. DreamWorks took a pretty bold step here—usually, it’s Disney pulling the big emotional punches, so I was impressed with the risk they took.
Visually, the graphics were fantastic, but there were a few little things that could have been smoother. Some textures, like hair and armor, didn’t flow as nicely as the rest of the animation. It felt like they spent so much time on the grand scale—the swooping camera angles, the dynamic glides, the whole “perspective enhancement” for the audience—that they missed out on details like the texture of scales or the way hair moves. Not a dealbreaker, but worth noting.
The plot was solid, everything made sense, and DreamWorks nailed the balance between excitement, fun, and heart. The mom storyline, though a bit too perfect, didn’t bother me too much because, hey, it’s DreamWorks and they’re aiming for a younger audience.
Now, let’s talk about the villain—Drago Bloodfist. Sure, he’s the bad guy, but I had one question: Where did he come from? The film does explain his backstory a little, but honestly, I felt like we needed more. When he talks about losing his family to dragons and seeking revenge, I was hoping for a brief flashback to really understand his motivations. Just hearing him say it wasn’t enough for me. It didn’t quite land the way it could’ve.
But that’s really my only gripe. If you love flying dragon-riders, evolving friendships, and moments that mix laughter with heartache, then this movie is definitely worth a watch. And if you’re not sure? Watch it anyway—it’s awesome.
Edit: Can we talk about that dragon during the “war” sequence? The one that lit itself on fire and rolled around like a flaming wheel? Seriously, so cool.
-
Rampage: Capital Punishment
Wow. I don’t even know where to start with the messages in this film.
Bill Williamson, the protagonist, is fed up—with the U.S. government, political corruption, systemic inequality, and the way the rich manipulate the law while the poor keep getting crushed. He doesn’t just say these things; he forces you to see them. His argument? That the government isn’t just influenced by money—it’s owned by it. Money is the law, and the system is rigged to keep power in the hands of the elite. Bill doesn’t just rant; he rewires your perspective on America—past, present, and future.
And how does he deliver this message? By hijacking a news broadcast and unleashing an unfiltered, brutal manifesto. He tears into everything: healthcare, oil companies, war, political hypocrisy (calling out presidents like Washington and Obama), child casualties, and even pop culture distractions. It’s like he’s screaming every suppressed truth people have whispered about for decades.
The film’s production? Solid but not groundbreaking. The action is standard—explosions, gunfights, nothing revolutionary—but honestly, I didn’t care. The message was too gripping to focus on technical flaws. Maybe they could’ve fleshed out Bill’s backstory more, but since this might tie into the first movie (which I haven’t seen), I’ll cut it some slack. Plus, the actor nailed the role—his intensity, his delivery, even his look was perfect. Character score: +1.
Now, his methods? Absolutely extreme. But ask yourself: Would anyone have listened if he’d protested peacefully? How much do you really care about change? How far would you go to make it happen? Bill doesn’t just talk—he dares you to act. And while I didn’t agree with everything he said (let’s be clear, I’m not signing up for his manifesto), his arguments hit hard. As someone who already thinks about these issues, this movie was exactly what I needed.
Fair warning: It’s violent. Bloody. Uncomfortable. But that’s the point—it’s supposed to shake you. If you can’t handle gore, harsh truths, or the sound of gunfire, skip it. But if you’re tired of sugarcoated lies and want a film that rages against the machine? Watch this.
-
Source Code (2011)
Source Code is one of those movies that starts with a killer premise and just runs with it.
(more…)
